<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- See queue.xsd for validation -->
<rfc-editor-queue xmlns="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-editor-queue"><section name="IETF STREAM: TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ARCHITECTURE AND SIGNALING"><entry id="draft-ietf-teas-rfc8776-update"><draft>draft-ietf-teas-rfc8776-update-23.txt</draft><date-received>2026-05-21</date-received><assignments><assignment>ref_checker</assignment></assignments><authors>Italo Busi, Aihua Guo, Xufeng Liu, Tarek Saad, Igor Bryskin</authors><title>Common YANG Data Types for Traffic Engineering</title><source>Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang"><draft>draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-25.txt</draft><date-received>2025-05-12</date-received><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-teas-rfc8776-update</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>B. Wu, D. Dhody, R. Rokui, T. Saad, J. Mullooly</authors><title>A YANG Data Model for the RFC 9543 Network Slice Service</title><source>Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing"><draft>draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-10.txt</draft><date-received>2024-08-28</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics</ref-name><ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-teas-te-service-mapping-yang</ref-name><ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-teas-yang-te</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>D. King, J. Drake, H. Zheng, A. Farrel</authors><title>Applicability of Abstraction and Control of Traffic Engineered Networks (ACTN) to IETF Network Slicing</title><source>Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-teas-yang-te"><draft>draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-44.txt</draft><date-received>2026-03-30</date-received><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-teas-rfc8776-update</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>T. Saad, R. Gandhi, X. Liu, V. Pavan Beeram, I. Bryskin</authors><title>A YANG Data Model for Traffic Engineering Tunnels, Label Switched Paths, and Interfaces</title><source>Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: WEB AUTHORIZATION PROTOCOL"><entry id="draft-ietf-oauth-status-list"><draft>draft-ietf-oauth-status-list-20.txt</draft><date-received>2026-06-04</date-received><assignments><assignment>ref_checker</assignment></assignments><authors>Tobias Looker, Paul Bastian, Christian Bormann</authors><title>Token Status List (TSL)</title><source>Web Authorization Protocol</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-oauth-browser-based-apps"><draft>draft-ietf-oauth-browser-based-apps-26.txt</draft><date-received>2025-07-08</date-received><assignments><assignment>second_editor</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>A. Parecki, P. Ryck, D. Waite</authors><title>OAuth 2.0 for Browser-Based Applications</title><source>Web Authorization Protocol</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-oauth-cross-device-security"><draft>draft-ietf-oauth-cross-device-security-16.txt</draft><date-received>2026-02-24</date-received><authors>P. Kasselman, D. Fett, F. Skokan</authors><title>Cross-Device Flows: Security Best Current Practice</title><source>Web Authorization Protocol</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-oauth-rfc7523bis"><draft>draft-ietf-oauth-rfc7523bis-11.txt</draft><date-received>2026-04-30</date-received><assignments><assignment>ref_checker</assignment></assignments><authors>M. Jones, B. Campbell, C. Mortimore, F. Skokan</authors><title>Updates to OAuth 2.0 JSON Web Token (JWT) Client Authentication and Assertion-Based Authorization Grants</title><source>Web Authorization Protocol</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-oauth-identity-chaining"><draft>draft-ietf-oauth-identity-chaining-15.txt</draft><date-received>2026-06-22</date-received><assignments><assignment>formatting</assignment></assignments><authors>Arndt Schwenkschuster, Pieter Kasselman, Kelley Burgin, Michael Jenkins, Brian Campbell, Aaron Parecki</authors><title>OAuth Identity and Authorization Chaining Across Domains</title><source>Web Authorization Protocol</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: REGISTRATION PROTOCOLS EXTENSIONS"><entry id="draft-ietf-regext-rdap-ttl-extension"><draft>draft-ietf-regext-rdap-ttl-extension-11.txt</draft><date-received>2026-05-21</date-received><authors>Gavin Brown</authors><title>RDAP Extension for DNS Time-To-Live (TTL Values)</title><source>Registration Protocols Extensions</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: BGP ENABLED SERVICES"><entry id="draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage"><draft>draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-37.txt</draft><date-received>2026-06-03</date-received><assignments><assignment>ref_checker</assignment></assignments><authors>Linda Dunbar, Ali Sajassi, John Drake, Basil Najem, Sue Hares</authors><title>BGP Usage for SD-WAN Overlay Networks</title><source>BGP Enabled ServiceS</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking"><draft>draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-18.txt</draft><date-received>2026-03-09</date-received><authors>J. Rabadan, Ed., A. Sajassi, Ed., E. Rosen, J. Drake, W. Lin, J. Uttaro, A. Simpson</authors><title>Interconnecting EVPN and IPVPN Domains</title><source>BGP Enabled ServiceS</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb"><draft>draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-35.txt</draft><date-received>2026-03-15</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-bess-evpn-per-mcast-flow-df-election</ref-name><ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state></normRef><authors>N. Malhotra, Ed., A. Sajassi, J. Rabadan, J. Drake, A. Lingala, S. Thoria</authors><title>Weighted Multi-Path Procedures for EVPN Multi-Homing</title><source>BGP Enabled ServiceS</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-sr-p2mp"><draft>draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-sr-p2mp-18.txt</draft><date-received>2026-01-26</date-received><authors>R. Parekh, Ed., D. Voyer, Ed., C. Filsfils, H. Bidgoli, Z. Zhang</authors><title>Multicast and Ethernet VPN with Segment Routing P2MP and Ingress Replication</title><source>BGP Enabled ServiceS</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: IPV6 MAINTENANCE"><entry id="draft-ietf-6man-snac-router-ra-flag"><draft>draft-ietf-6man-snac-router-ra-flag-08.txt</draft><date-received>2026-06-05</date-received><authors>Jonathan Hui</authors><title>SNAC Router Flag in ICMPv6 Router Advertisement Messages</title><source>IPv6 Maintenance</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update"><draft>draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update-25.txt</draft><date-received>2025-09-03</date-received><assignments><assignment>ref_checker</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-6man-snac-router-ra-flag</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>N. Buraglio, T. Chown, J. Duncan</authors><title>Prioritizing known-local IPv6 ULAs through address selection policy</title><source>IPv6 Maintenance</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-6man-icmpv6-reflection"><draft>draft-ietf-6man-icmpv6-reflection-19.txt</draft><date-received>2025-12-29</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-intarea-rfc8335bis</ref-name><ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state></normRef><authors>T. Mizrahi, X. He, T. Zhou, R. Bonica, X. Min</authors><title>Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMPv6) Reflection</title><source>IPv6 Maintenance</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-6man-sidlist-clarification"><draft>draft-ietf-6man-sidlist-clarification-03.txt</draft><date-received>2026-05-26</date-received><authors>Adrian Farrel, Suresh Krishnan</authors><title>Clarifying SRv6 SID List Processing</title><source>IPv6 Maintenance</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: BUILDING BLOCKS FOR HTTP APIS"><entry id="draft-ietf-httpapi-privacy"><draft>draft-ietf-httpapi-privacy-06.txt</draft><date-received>2026-06-05</date-received><authors>Rich Salz, Mike Bishop, Marius Kleidl</authors><title>Protecting Credentials with HTTP APIs</title><source>Building Blocks for HTTP APIs</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-httpapi-digest-fields-problem-types"><draft>draft-ietf-httpapi-digest-fields-problem-types-06.txt</draft><date-received>2026-06-25</date-received><assignments><assignment>formatting</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-httpbis-unencoded-digest</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>Marius Kleidl, Lucas Pardue, Roberto Polli</authors><title>HTTP Problem Types for Digest Fields</title><source>Building Blocks for HTTP APIs</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: INTER-DOMAIN ROUTING"><entry id="draft-ietf-idr-nhc"><draft>draft-ietf-idr-nhc-07.txt</draft><date-received>2026-06-09</date-received><assignments><assignment>ref_checker</assignment></assignments><authors>Bruno Decraene, Ed., Kireeti Kompella, Serge Krier, SATYA R MOHANTY, John Scudder, Ed., Kevin Wang, Bin Wen</authors><title>BGP Next Hop Dependent Characteristics Attribute</title><source>Inter-Domain Routing</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-sr-vtn-mt"><draft>draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-sr-vtn-mt-14.txt</draft><date-received>2025-10-20</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt</ref-name><ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn</ref-name><ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments</ref-name><ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state></normRef><authors>C. Xie, C. Li, J. Dong, Z. Li</authors><title>Applicability of Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) with Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Network Resource Partitions (NRPs)</title><source>Inter-Domain Routing</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-idr-vpn-prefix-orf"><draft>draft-ietf-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-45.txt</draft><date-received>2026-07-07</date-received><assignments><assignment>formatting</assignment></assignments><authors>Wei Wang, Aijun Wang, Haibo Wang, Gyan Mishra, Jie Dong</authors><title>VPN Prefix Outbound Route Filter (VPN Prefix ORF) for BGP-4</title><source>Inter-Domain Routing</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-ip"><draft>draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-ip-16.txt</draft><date-received>2026-05-27</date-received><assignments><assignment>formatting</assignment></assignments><authors>Jeff Haas, Wim Henderickx, Adam Simpson</authors><title>BGP Flow-Spec Redirect-to-IP Action</title><source>Inter-Domain Routing</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="ISE STREAM"><entry id="draft-dekater-scion-pki"><draft>draft-dekater-scion-pki-14.txt</draft><date-received>2026-06-22</date-received><assignments><assignment>ref_checker</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-dekater-scion-controlplane</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-dekater-scion-dataplane</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>Corine de Kater, Nicola Rustignoli, Samuel Hitz</authors><title>SCION Control Plane PKI</title><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-dekater-scion-dataplane"><draft>draft-dekater-scion-dataplane-14.txt</draft><date-received>2026-04-07</date-received><assignments><assignment>ref_checker</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-dekater-scion-controlplane</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-dekater-scion-pki</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>C. de Kater, N. Rustignoli, J. C. Hugly, S. Hitz</authors><title>SCION Data Plane</title><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-dekater-scion-controlplane"><draft>draft-dekater-scion-controlplane-18.txt</draft><date-received>2026-04-30</date-received><assignments><assignment>ref_checker</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-dekater-scion-dataplane</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-dekater-scion-pki</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>C. de Kater, N. Rustignoli, S. Hitz</authors><title>SCION Control Plane</title><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-pantos-content-steering"><draft>draft-pantos-content-steering-05.txt</draft><date-received>2026-05-18</date-received><authors>R. Pantos, Ed., E. Vershen</authors><title>Pathway-based Content Steering</title><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-pantos-hls-rfc8216bis"><draft>draft-pantos-hls-rfc8216bis-22.txt</draft><date-received>2026-05-15</date-received><assignments><assignment>ref_checker</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-pantos-content-steering</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>R. Pantos, Ed.</authors><title>HTTP Live Streaming 2nd Edition</title><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: AUTOMATED CERTIFICATE MANAGEMENT ENVIRONMENT"><entry id="draft-ietf-acme-integrations"><draft>draft-ietf-acme-integrations-17.txt</draft><date-received>2023-07-14</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-anima-brski-cloud</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>O. Friel, R. Barnes, R. Shekh-Yusef, M. Richardson</authors><title>ACME Integrations for Device Certificate Enrollment</title><source>Automated Certificate Management Environment</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: PATH COMPUTATION ELEMENT"><entry id="draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13"><draft>draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13-04.txt</draft><date-received>2024-01-09</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>D. Dhody, S. Turner, R. Housley</authors><title>Updates for PCEPS: TLS Connection Establishment Restrictions</title><source>Path Computation Element</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo"><draft>draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo-29.txt</draft><date-received>2025-10-17</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>S. Sidor, Z. Rose, S. Peng, S. Peng, A. Stone</authors><title>Carrying SR-Algorithm in Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP)</title><source>Path Computation Element</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions"><draft>draft-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-16.txt</draft><date-received>2026-03-16</date-received><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>S. Sidor, P. Maheshwari, A. Stone, L. Jalil, S. Peng</authors><title>Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) extensions for Circuit Style Policies</title><source>Path Computation Element</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-pce-sr-bidir-path"><draft>draft-ietf-pce-sr-bidir-path-25.txt</draft><date-received>2026-03-09</date-received><assignments><assignment>formatting</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-pce-multipath</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>C. Li, Ed., M. Chen, W. Cheng, R. Gandhi, Ed., Q. Xiong</authors><title>Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Associated Bidirectional Segment Routing (SR) LSPs</title><source>Path Computation Element</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-pce-multipath"><draft>draft-ietf-pce-multipath-29.txt</draft><date-received>2026-07-07</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>Mike Koldychev, Ed., Samuel Sidor, Ed.</authors><title>Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Signaling Multipath Information</title><source>Path Computation Element</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: TRUSTED EXECUTION ENVIRONMENT PROVISIONING"><entry id="draft-ietf-teep-otrp-over-http"><draft>draft-ietf-teep-otrp-over-http-15.txt</draft><date-received>2023-05-17</date-received><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-teep-protocol</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>D. Thaler</authors><title>HTTP Transport for Trusted Execution Environment Provisioning: Agent Initiated Communication</title><source>Trusted Execution Environment Provisioning</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-teep-protocol"><draft>draft-ietf-teep-protocol-26.txt</draft><date-received>2026-03-06</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-report</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-manifest</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-trust-domains</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-mti</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>H. Tschofenig, M. Pei, D. Wheeler, D. Thaler, A. Tsukamoto</authors><title>Trusted Execution Environment Provisioning (TEEP) Protocol</title><source>Trusted Execution Environment Provisioning</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: INTERFACE TO NETWORK SECURITY FUNCTIONS"><entry id="draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm"><draft>draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-31.txt</draft><date-received>2023-06-21</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>J. Jeong, Ed., C. Chung, T. Ahn, R. Kumar, S. Hares</authors><title>I2NSF Consumer-Facing Interface YANG Data Model</title><source>Interface to Network Security Functions</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model"><draft>draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32.txt</draft><date-received>2022-05-16</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>S. Hares, Ed., J. Jeong, Ed., J. Kim, R. Moskowitz, Q. Lin</authors><title>I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model</title><source>Interface to Network Security Functions</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model"><draft>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-20.txt</draft><date-received>2022-05-18</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>J. Jeong, P. Lingga, S. Hares, L. Xia, H. Birkholz</authors><title>I2NSF NSF Monitoring Interface YANG Data Model</title><source>Interface to Network Security Functions</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm"><draft>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-29.txt</draft><date-received>2022-05-16</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>J. Kim, Ed., J. Jeong, Ed., J. Park, S. Hares, Q. Lin</authors><title>I2NSF Network Security Function-Facing Interface YANG Data Model</title><source>Interface to Network Security Functions</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-i2nsf-applicability"><draft>draft-ietf-i2nsf-applicability-19.txt</draft><date-received>2019-12-16</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>J. Jeong, S. Hyun, T. Ahn, S. Hares, D. Lopez</authors><title>Applicability of Interfaces to Network Security Functions to Network-Based Security Services</title><source>Interface to Network Security Functions</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm"><draft>draft-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm-26.txt</draft><date-received>2023-05-10</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-applicability</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>S. Hyun, Ed., J. Jeong, Ed., T. Roh, S. Wi, J. Park</authors><title>I2NSF Registration Interface YANG Data Model for NSF Capability Registration</title><source>Interface to Network Security Functions</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: NETWORK CONFIGURATION"><entry id="draft-ietf-netconf-over-tls13"><draft>draft-ietf-netconf-over-tls13-04.txt</draft><date-received>2024-01-19</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>S. Turner, R. Housley</authors><title>Updates to Using the NETCONF Protocol over Transport Layer Security (TLS) with Mutual X.509 Authentication</title><source>Network Configuration</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server"><draft>draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server-45.txt</draft><date-received>2025-11-12</date-received><assignments><assignment>final_review_editor</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>K. Watsen</authors><title>A YANG Data Model for RESTCONF Clients and Servers</title><source>Network Configuration</source><consensus>no</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-netconf-netconf-client-server"><draft>draft-ietf-netconf-netconf-client-server-41.txt</draft><date-received>2025-11-12</date-received><assignments><assignment>final_review_editor</assignment></assignments><authors>K. Watsen</authors><title>A YANG Data Model for NETCONF Clients and Servers</title><source>Network Configuration</source><consensus>no</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library-augmentedby"><draft>draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library-augmentedby-18.txt</draft><date-received>2026-03-02</date-received><authors>Z. Lin, B. Claise, I. Martinez-Casanueva</authors><title>Augmented-by Addition to the YANG Library</title><source>Network Configuration</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-netconf-adaptive-subscription"><draft>draft-ietf-netconf-adaptive-subscription-18.txt</draft><date-received>2026-04-21</date-received><authors>Q. Wu, P. Liu, Q. Ma, W. Wang, Z. Niu</authors><title>Adaptive Subscription to YANG Notifications</title><source>Network Configuration</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server"><draft>draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server-33.txt</draft><date-received>2025-11-12</date-received><assignments><assignment>second_editor</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-netconf-udp-client-server</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>K. Watsen</authors><title>YANG Groupings for HTTP Clients and HTTP Servers</title><source>Network Configuration</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: COMMON CONTROL AND MEASUREMENT PLANE"><entry id="draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types"><draft>draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-18.txt</draft><date-received>2024-02-23</date-received><assignments><assignment>ref_checker</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-teas-rfc8776-update</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>H. Zheng, I. Busi</authors><title>Common YANG Data Types for Layer 1 Networks</title><source>Common Control and Measurement Plane</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-ccamp-l1csm-yang"><draft>draft-ietf-ccamp-l1csm-yang-26.txt</draft><date-received>2024-04-12</date-received><assignments><assignment>ref_checker</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>Y. Lee, K. Lee, H. Zheng, O. Gonzalez de Dios, D. Ceccarelli</authors><title>A YANG Data Model for L1 Connectivity Service Model (L1CSM)</title><source>Common Control and Measurement Plane</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang"><draft>draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang-20.txt</draft><date-received>2024-11-21</date-received><assignments><assignment>ref_checker</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>H. Zheng, I. Busi, X. Liu, S. Belotti, O. Gonzalez de Dios</authors><title>A YANG Data Model for Optical Transport Network Topology</title><source>Common Control and Measurement Plane</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis"><draft>draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-19.txt</draft><date-received>2025-10-20</date-received><assignments><assignment>formatting</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-teas-rfc8776-update</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>S. Belotti, Ed., I. Busi, Ed., D. Beller, Ed., E. Le Rouzic, A. Guo</authors><title>Common YANG Data Types for Layer 0 Optical Networks</title><source>Common Control and Measurement Plane</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang"><draft>draft-ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-23.txt</draft><date-received>2026-03-15</date-received><assignments><assignment>formatting</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-teas-rfc8776-update</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>D. Beller, Ed., E. Le Rouzic, S. Belotti, G. Galimberti, I. Busi</authors><title>A YANG Data Model for Optical Impairment-aware Topology</title><source>Common Control and Measurement Plane</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: EMERGENCY CONTEXT RESOLUTION WITH INTERNET TECHNOLOGIES"><entry id="draft-ietf-ecrit-similar-location"><draft>draft-ietf-ecrit-similar-location-19.txt</draft><date-received>2022-03-07</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-planned-changes</ref-name><ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state></normRef><authors>B. Rosen, R. Marshall, J. Martin</authors><title>A LoST extension to return complete and similar location info</title><source>Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: JSON MAIL ACCESS PROTOCOL"><entry id="draft-ietf-jmap-calendars"><draft>draft-ietf-jmap-calendars-26.txt</draft><date-received>2024-11-14</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-calext-jscalendarbis</ref-name><ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state></normRef><authors>N. Jenkins, Ed., M. Douglass, Ed.</authors><title>JSON Meta Application Protocol (JMAP) for Calendars</title><source>JSON Mail Access Protocol</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: CBOR OBJECT SIGNING AND ENCRYPTION"><entry id="draft-ietf-cose-hash-envelope"><draft>draft-ietf-cose-hash-envelope-10.txt</draft><date-received>2025-10-27</date-received><authors>O. Steele, S. Lasker, H. Birkholz</authors><title>COSE Hash Envelope</title><source>CBOR Object Signing and Encryption</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: BENCHMARKING METHODOLOGY"><entry id="draft-ietf-bmwg-mlrsearch"><draft>draft-ietf-bmwg-mlrsearch-15.txt</draft><date-received>2025-11-05</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><authors>M. Konstantynowicz, V. Polák</authors><title>Multiple Loss Ratio Search</title><source>Benchmarking Methodology</source><consensus>no</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-bmwg-network-tester-cfg"><draft>draft-ietf-bmwg-network-tester-cfg-17.txt</draft><date-received>2026-07-07</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><authors>Vladimir Vassilev</authors><title>A YANG Data Model for Network Tester Management</title><source>Benchmarking Methodology</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: NETWORK TIME PROTOCOLS"><entry id="draft-ietf-ntp-over-ptp"><draft>draft-ietf-ntp-over-ptp-08.txt</draft><date-received>2025-11-17</date-received><assignments><assignment>second_editor</assignment></assignments><authors>M. Lichvar</authors><title>NTP Over PTP</title><source>Network Time Protocols</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-ntp-roughtime"><draft>draft-ietf-ntp-roughtime-19.txt</draft><date-received>2026-03-17</date-received><authors>W. Ladd, M. Dansarie</authors><title>Roughtime</title><source>Network Time Protocols</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: DISPATCH"><entry id="draft-ietf-dispatch-mime-protobuf"><draft>draft-ietf-dispatch-mime-protobuf-07.txt</draft><date-received>2025-11-20</date-received><assignments><assignment>final_review_editor</assignment></assignments><authors>M. Kucherawy, Ed., W. Kumari, R. Sloan</authors><title>Media Type Registration for Protocol Buffers</title><source>Dispatch</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: REMOTE ATTESTATION PROCEDURES"><entry id="draft-ietf-rats-msg-wrap"><draft>draft-ietf-rats-msg-wrap-23.txt</draft><date-received>2025-12-08</date-received><authors>H. Birkholz, N. Smith, T. Fossati, H. Tschofenig, D. Glaze</authors><title>RATS Conceptual Messages Wrapper (CMW)</title><source>Remote ATtestation ProcedureS</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-rats-eat-measured-component"><draft>draft-ietf-rats-eat-measured-component-12.txt</draft><date-received>2026-02-20</date-received><assignments><assignment>final_review_editor</assignment></assignments><authors>S. Frost, T. Fossati, H. Tschofenig, H. Birkholz</authors><title>Entity Attestation Token (EAT) Measured Component</title><source>Remote ATtestation ProcedureS</source><consensus>no</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: REVISION OF CORE EMAIL SPECIFICATIONS"><entry id="draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5321bis"><draft>draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5321bis-44.txt</draft><date-received>2025-03-18</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5322bis</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-emailcore-as</ref-name><ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state></normRef><authors>J. Klensin</authors><title>Simple Mail Transfer Protocol</title><source>Revision of core Email specifications</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5322bis"><draft>draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5322bis-12.txt</draft><date-received>2025-03-18</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5321bis</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-emailcore-as</ref-name><ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state></normRef><authors>P. Resnick, Ed.</authors><title>Internet Message Format</title><source>Revision of core Email specifications</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: TRANSPORT LAYER SECURITY"><entry id="draft-ietf-tls-tls12-frozen"><draft>draft-ietf-tls-tls12-frozen-08.txt</draft><date-received>2025-06-18</date-received><assignments><assignment>final_review_editor</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>R. Salz, N. Aviram</authors><title>TLS 1.2 is in Feature Freeze</title><source>Transport Layer Security</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design"><draft>draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design-16.txt</draft><date-received>2025-09-17</date-received><authors>D. Stebila, S. Fluhrer, S. Gueron</authors><title>Hybrid key exchange in TLS 1.3</title><source>Transport Layer Security</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis"><draft>draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis-14.txt</draft><date-received>2025-08-11</date-received><authors>E. Rescorla</authors><title>The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3</title><source>Transport Layer Security</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-tls-keylogfile"><draft>draft-ietf-tls-keylogfile-05.txt</draft><date-received>2025-06-11</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>M. Thomson, Y. Rosomakho, H. Tschofenig</authors><title>The SSLKEYLOGFILE Format for TLS</title><source>Transport Layer Security</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-tls-8773bis"><draft>draft-ietf-tls-8773bis-13.txt</draft><date-received>2025-09-04</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>R. Housley</authors><title>TLS 1.3 Extension for Using Certificates with an External Pre-Shared Key</title><source>Transport Layer Security</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-tls-deprecate-obsolete-kex"><draft>draft-ietf-tls-deprecate-obsolete-kex-08.txt</draft><date-received>2026-01-06</date-received><assignments><assignment>final_review_editor</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>N. Aviram</authors><title>Deprecating Obsolete Key Exchange Methods in (D)TLS 1.2</title><source>Transport Layer Security</source><consensus>no</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem"><draft>draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem-04.txt</draft><date-received>2026-02-11</date-received><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>K. Kwiatkowski, P. Kampanakis, B. Westerbaan, D. Stebila</authors><title>Post-quantum hybrid ECDHE-MLKEM Key Agreement for TLSv1.3</title><source>Transport Layer Security</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: LIMITED ADDITIONAL MECHANISMS FOR PKIX AND SMIME"><entry id="draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis"><draft>draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis-12.txt</draft><date-received>2024-09-13</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>T. Ito, C. Wilson, C. Bonnell, S. Turner</authors><title>Updates to Lightweight OCSP Profile for High Volume Environments</title><source>Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-lamps-macaddress-on"><draft>draft-ietf-lamps-macaddress-on-07.txt</draft><date-received>2026-03-13</date-received><authors>R. Housley, C. Bonnell, J. Mandel, T. Okubo, M. StJohns</authors><title>Media Access Control (MAC) Addresses in X.509 Certificates</title><source>Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5272bis"><draft>draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5272bis-11.txt</draft><date-received>2026-02-12</date-received><assignments><assignment>final_review_editor</assignment></assignments><authors>J. Mandel, Ed., S. Turner, Ed.</authors><title>Certificate Management over CMS (CMC)</title><source>Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5274bis"><draft>draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5274bis-11.txt</draft><date-received>2026-02-12</date-received><assignments><assignment>final_review_editor</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5272bis</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5273bis</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>J. Mandel, S. Turner</authors><title>Certificate Management Messages over CMS (CMC): Compliance Requirements</title><source>Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5273bis"><draft>draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5273bis-11.txt</draft><date-received>2026-02-12</date-received><assignments><assignment>final_review_editor</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5272bis</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>J. Mandel, S. Turner, Ed.</authors><title>Certificate Management over CMS (CMC): Transport Protocols</title><source>Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs"><draft>draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs-19.txt</draft><date-received>2026-04-22</date-received><assignments><assignment>ref_checker</assignment></assignments><authors>M. Ounsworth, J. Gray, M. Pala, J. Klaußner, S. Fluhrer</authors><title>Composite Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Algorithm (ML-DSA) for use in X.509 Public Key Infrastructure</title><source>Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-lamps-cms-composite-sigs"><draft>draft-ietf-lamps-cms-composite-sigs-05.txt</draft><date-received>2026-05-22</date-received><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>Mike Ounsworth, John Gray, Jan Klaußner, Daniel Van Geest</authors><title>Composite Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Algorithm (ML-DSA) for use in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)</title><source>Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: SOFTWARE UPDATES FOR INTERNET OF THINGS"><entry id="draft-ietf-suit-trust-domains"><draft>draft-ietf-suit-trust-domains-12.txt</draft><date-received>2025-07-23</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-manifest</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-firmware-encryption</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>B. Moran, K. Takayama</authors><title>Software Update for the Internet of Things (SUIT) Manifest Extensions for Multiple Trust Domain</title><source>Software Updates for Internet of Things</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-suit-manifest"><draft>draft-ietf-suit-manifest-34.txt</draft><date-received>2025-02-25</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-report</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-update-management</ref-name><ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-trust-domains</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-firmware-encryption</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-mti</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>B. Moran, H. Tschofenig, H. Birkholz, K. Zandberg, Ø. Rønningstad</authors><title>A Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)-based Serialization Format for the Software Updates for Internet of Things (SUIT) Manifest</title><source>Software Updates for Internet of Things</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-suit-mti"><draft>draft-ietf-suit-mti-23.txt</draft><date-received>2025-07-23</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-manifest</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>B. Moran, Ø. Rønningstad, A. Tsukamoto</authors><title>Cryptographic Algorithms for Internet of Things (IoT) Devices</title><source>Software Updates for Internet of Things</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-suit-mud"><draft>draft-ietf-suit-mud-10.txt</draft><date-received>2025-02-25</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-manifest</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>B. Moran, H. Tschofenig</authors><title>Strong Assertions of IoT Network Access Requirements</title><source>Software Updates for Internet of Things</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-suit-firmware-encryption"><draft>draft-ietf-suit-firmware-encryption-26.txt</draft><date-received>2025-04-21</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-manifest</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-trust-domains</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-mti</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>H. Tschofenig, R. Housley, B. Moran, D. Brown, K. Takayama</authors><title>Encrypted Payloads in SUIT Manifests</title><source>Software Updates for Internet of Things</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-suit-report"><draft>draft-ietf-suit-report-19.txt</draft><date-received>2025-12-09</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-mti</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-manifest</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>B. Moran, H. Birkholz</authors><title>Secure Reporting of SUIT Update Status</title><source>Software Updates for Internet of Things</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: RADIUS EXTENSIONS"><entry id="draft-ietf-radext-reverse-coa"><draft>draft-ietf-radext-reverse-coa-08.txt</draft><date-received>2025-08-28</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-radext-radiusdtls-bis</ref-name><ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state></normRef><authors>A. DeKok, V. Cargatser</authors><title>Reverse Change-of-Authorization (CoA) in RADIUS/(D)TLS</title><source>RADIUS EXTensions</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: APPLICATION-LAYER TRAFFIC OPTIMIZATION"><entry id="draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang"><draft>draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang-18.txt</draft><date-received>2024-01-23</date-received><assignments><assignment>final_review_editor</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-netconf-netconf-client-server</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>J. Zhang, D. Dhody, K. Gao, R. Schott, Q. Ma</authors><title>YANG Data Models for the Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) Protocol</title><source>Application-Layer Traffic Optimization</source><consensus>no</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: HTTP"><entry id="draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis"><draft>draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-22.txt</draft><date-received>2025-12-02</date-received><assignments><assignment>final_review_editor</assignment></assignments><authors>S. Bingler, Ed., M. West, Ed., J. Wilander, Ed.</authors><title>Cookies: HTTP State Management Mechanism</title><source>HTTP</source><consensus>no</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-httpbis-incremental"><draft>draft-ietf-httpbis-incremental-04.txt</draft><date-received>2026-03-02</date-received><authors>K. Oku, T. Pauly, M. Thomson</authors><title>Incremental Forwarding of HTTP Messages</title><source>HTTP</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-httpbis-unencoded-digest"><draft>draft-ietf-httpbis-unencoded-digest-05.txt</draft><date-received>2026-06-22</date-received><authors>Lucas Pardue, Mike West</authors><title>HTTP Unencoded Digest</title><source>HTTP</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: AUTONOMIC NETWORKING INTEGRATED MODEL AND APPROACH"><entry id="draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher"><draft>draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher-16.txt</draft><date-received>2025-01-16</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis</ref-name><ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state></normRef><authors>T. Werner, M. Richardson</authors><title>JWS signed Voucher Artifacts for Bootstrapping Protocols</title><source>Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm"><draft>draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-23.txt</draft><date-received>2026-05-04</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis</ref-name><ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state></normRef><authors>S. Fries, T. Werner, E. Lear, M. Richardson</authors><title>BRSKI with Pledge in Responder Mode (BRSKI-PRM)</title><source>Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-anima-brski-cloud"><draft>draft-ietf-anima-brski-cloud-19.txt</draft><date-received>2025-09-10</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis</ref-name><ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state></normRef><authors>O. Friel, R. Shekh-Yusef, M. Richardson</authors><title>Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI) Cloud Registrar</title><source>Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: USING TLS IN APPLICATIONS"><entry id="draft-ietf-uta-require-tls13"><draft>draft-ietf-uta-require-tls13-12.txt</draft><date-received>2025-06-25</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-tls12-frozen</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>R. Salz, N. Aviram</authors><title>New Protocols Using TLS Must Require TLS 1.3</title><source>Using TLS in Applications</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: BIT INDEXED EXPLICIT REPLICATION"><entry id="draft-ietf-bier-php"><draft>draft-ietf-bier-php-16.txt</draft><date-received>2024-12-06</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-bier-lsr-non-mpls-extensions</ref-name><ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-bier-ospfv3-extensions</ref-name><ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state></normRef><authors>Z. Zhang</authors><title>BIER Penultimate Hop Popping</title><source>Bit Indexed Explicit Replication</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: POST-QUANTUM USE IN PROTOCOLS"><entry id="draft-ietf-pquip-hybrid-signature-spectrums"><draft>draft-ietf-pquip-hybrid-signature-spectrums-07.txt</draft><date-received>2025-09-09</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>N. Bindel, B. Hale, D. Connolly, F. Driscoll</authors><title>Hybrid signature spectrums</title><source>Post-Quantum Use In Protocols</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-pquip-hbs-state"><draft>draft-ietf-pquip-hbs-state-04.txt</draft><date-received>2026-03-03</date-received><authors>T. Wiggers, K. Bashiri, S. Kölbl, J. Goodman, S. Kousidis</authors><title>Hash-based Signatures: State and Backup Management</title><source>Post-Quantum Use In Protocols</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: CONSTRAINED RESTFUL ENVIRONMENTS"><entry id="draft-ietf-core-href"><draft>draft-ietf-core-href-30.txt</draft><date-received>2025-11-06</date-received><assignments><assignment>final_review_editor</assignment></assignments><authors>C. Bormann, Ed., H. Birkholz</authors><title>Constrained Resource Identifiers</title><source>Constrained RESTful Environments</source><consensus>no</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-core-yang-sid-pen"><draft>draft-ietf-core-yang-sid-pen-06.txt</draft><date-received>2026-01-22</date-received><assignments><assignment>final_review_editor</assignment></assignments><authors>C. Bormann</authors><title>YANG-CBOR: Allocating SID ranges for PEN holders</title><source>Constrained RESTful Environments</source><consensus>no</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-core-oscore-groupcomm"><draft>draft-ietf-core-oscore-groupcomm-28.txt</draft><date-received>2026-02-03</date-received><assignments><assignment>second_editor</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>M. Tiloca, G. Selander, F. Palombini, J. Preuß Mattsson, R. Höglund</authors><title>Group Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (Group OSCORE)</title><source>Constrained RESTful Environments</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis"><draft>draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis-18.txt</draft><date-received>2026-02-03</date-received><assignments><assignment>second_editor</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-core-oscore-groupcomm</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>E. Dijk, M. Tiloca</authors><title>Group Communication for the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)</title><source>Constrained RESTful Environments</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: AUTOMATIC SIP TRUNKING AND PEERING"><entry id="draft-ietf-asap-sip-auto-peer"><draft>draft-ietf-asap-sip-auto-peer-41.txt</draft><date-received>2026-01-05</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><authors>K. Inamdar, S. Narayanan, C. Jennings</authors><title>Automatic Peering for SIP Trunks</title><source>Automatic SIP trunking And Peering</source><consensus>no</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: NETWORK MODELING"><entry id="draft-ietf-netmod-system-config"><draft>draft-ietf-netmod-system-config-20.txt</draft><date-received>2026-01-26</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><authors>Q. Ma, Ed., Q. Wu, C. Feng</authors><title>System-defined Configuration</title><source>Network Modeling</source><consensus>no</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-netmod-immutable-flag"><draft>draft-ietf-netmod-immutable-flag-14.txt</draft><date-received>2026-07-07</date-received><assignments><assignment>formatting</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-netmod-system-config</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>Qiufang Ma, Ed., Qin Wu, Balázs Lengyel, Ed., Hongwei Li</authors><title>YANG Metadata Annotation for Immutable Flag</title><source>Network Modeling</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM"><entry id="draft-davids-forsalereg"><draft>draft-davids-forsalereg-21.txt</draft><date-received>2026-02-05</date-received><authors>M. Davids</authors><title>The "_for-sale" Underscored and Globally Scoped DNS Node Name</title><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-barnes-sframe-iana-256"><draft>draft-barnes-sframe-iana-256-06.txt</draft><date-received>2026-05-04</date-received><authors>R. Barnes, E. Omara, A. Rosenberg</authors><title>Updates to SFrame Cipher Suites Registry</title><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: DOMAIN NAME SYSTEM OPERATIONS"><entry id="draft-ietf-dnsop-3901bis"><draft>draft-ietf-dnsop-3901bis-17.txt</draft><date-received>2026-02-13</date-received><assignments><assignment>first_editor</assignment></assignments><authors>M. Yamamoto, T. Fiebig</authors><title>Operational Guidelines for DNS Transport in Mixed IPv4/IPv6 Environments</title><source>Domain Name System Operations</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-dnsop-ds-automation"><draft>draft-ietf-dnsop-ds-automation-09.txt</draft><date-received>2026-05-22</date-received><assignments><assignment>final_review_editor</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-dnsop-cds-consistency</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>Steve Sheng, Peter Thomassen</authors><title>Operational Recommendations for DNSSEC Delegation Signer (DS) Automation</title><source>Domain Name System Operations</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: MAIL MAINTENANCE"><entry id="draft-ietf-mailmaint-imap-uidbatches"><draft>draft-ietf-mailmaint-imap-uidbatches-22.txt</draft><date-received>2026-02-20</date-received><authors>D. Eggert, Ed.</authors><title>IMAP UIDBATCHES Extension</title><source>Mail Maintenance</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-mailmaint-expires"><draft>draft-ietf-mailmaint-expires-06.txt</draft><date-received>2026-05-08</date-received><authors>B. Billon, J. Levine</authors><title>Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field</title><source>Mail Maintenance</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: SECURE SHELL MAINTENANCE"><entry id="draft-ietf-sshm-mlkem-hybrid-kex"><draft>draft-ietf-sshm-mlkem-hybrid-kex-10.txt</draft><date-received>2026-02-24</date-received><authors>P. Kampanakis, D. Stebila, T. Hansen</authors><title>PQ/T Hybrid Key Exchange with ML-KEM in SSH</title><source>Secure Shell Maintenance</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: PROTOCOLS FOR IP MULTICAST"><entry id="draft-ietf-pim-zeroconf-mcast-addr-alloc-ps"><draft>draft-ietf-pim-zeroconf-mcast-addr-alloc-ps-13.txt</draft><date-received>2026-02-24</date-received><assignments><assignment>first_editor</assignment></assignments><authors>N. Karstens, D. Farinacci, M. McBride</authors><title>Zeroconf Multicast Address Allocation Problem Statement and Requirements</title><source>Protocols for IP Multicast</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-pim-updt-ipv6-dyn-mcast-addr-grp-id"><draft>draft-ietf-pim-updt-ipv6-dyn-mcast-addr-grp-id-13.txt</draft><date-received>2026-03-11</date-received><authors>N. Karstens, D. Farinacci, M. McBride</authors><title>Updates to Dynamic IPv6 Multicast Address Group IDs</title><source>Protocols for IP Multicast</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: EXTENSIONS FOR SCALABLE DNS SERVICE DISCOVERY"><entry id="draft-ietf-dnssd-multi-qtypes"><draft>draft-ietf-dnssd-multi-qtypes-14.txt</draft><date-received>2026-02-27</date-received><authors>R. Bellis</authors><title>DNS Multiple QTYPEs</title><source>Extensions for Scalable DNS Service Discovery</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: AUDIO/VIDEO TRANSPORT CORE MAINTENANCE"><entry id="draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-v3c"><draft>draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-v3c-17.txt</draft><date-received>2026-02-27</date-received><assignments><assignment>first_editor</assignment></assignments><authors>L. Ilola, L. Kondrad</authors><title>RTP Payload Format for Visual Volumetric Video-based Coding (V3C)</title><source>Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IRTF STREAM"><entry id="draft-irtf-cfrg-aegis-aead"><draft>draft-irtf-cfrg-aegis-aead-18.txt</draft><date-received>2026-03-02</date-received><authors>F. Denis, S. Lucas</authors><title>The AEGIS Family of Authenticated Encryption Algorithms</title><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: SOURCE PACKET ROUTING IN NETWORKING"><entry id="draft-ietf-spring-dhc-distribute-srv6-locator-dhcp"><draft>draft-ietf-spring-dhc-distribute-srv6-locator-dhcp-16.txt</draft><date-received>2026-03-06</date-received><authors>W. Cheng, Ed., R. Han, C. Lin, Ed., D. Voyer, G. Zhang</authors><title>Distribute SRv6 Locator by DHCP</title><source>Source Packet Routing in Networking</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-spring-cs-sr-policy"><draft>draft-ietf-spring-cs-sr-policy-17.txt</draft><date-received>2026-03-12</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-spring-sr-policy-yang</ref-name><ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-spring-stamp-srpm-mpls</ref-name><ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-spring-stamp-srpm-srv6</ref-name><ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-segment</ref-name><ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-pce-sr-bidir-path</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-pce-multipath</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>C. Schmutzer, Ed., Z. Ali, Ed., P. Maheshwari, R. Rokui, A. Stone</authors><title>Circuit Style Segment Routing Policy</title><source>Source Packet Routing in Networking</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: LINK STATE ROUTING"><entry id="draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-ls-link-infinity"><draft>draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-ls-link-infinity-25.txt</draft><date-received>2026-03-15</date-received><authors>L. Gong, W. Cheng, C. Lin, A. Lindem, R. Chen</authors><title>Advertising Unreachable Links in OSPF</title><source>Link State Routing</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: LOCATOR/ID SEPARATION PROTOCOL"><entry id="draft-ietf-lisp-geo"><draft>draft-ietf-lisp-geo-20.txt</draft><date-received>2026-03-15</date-received><authors>D. Farinacci</authors><title>LISP Geo-Coordinates</title><source>Locator/ID Separation Protocol</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-lisp-te"><draft>draft-ietf-lisp-te-25.txt</draft><date-received>2026-02-17</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8378bis</ref-name><ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6831bis</ref-name><ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state></normRef><authors>D. Farinacci, M. Kowal, P. Lahiri, P. Pillay-Esnault, Ed.</authors><title>LISP Traffic Engineering</title><source>Locator/ID Separation Protocol</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: AUTHENTICATION AND AUTHORIZATION FOR CONSTRAINED ENVIRONMENTS"><entry id="draft-ietf-ace-oscore-gm-admin"><draft>draft-ietf-ace-oscore-gm-admin-17.txt</draft><date-received>2026-03-12</date-received><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-core-oscore-groupcomm</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-ace-key-groupcomm-oscore</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>M. Tiloca, R. Höglund, P. van der Stok, F. Palombini</authors><title>Admin Interface for the OSCORE Group Manager</title><source>Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-ace-key-groupcomm-oscore"><draft>draft-ietf-ace-key-groupcomm-oscore-21.txt</draft><date-received>2026-03-16</date-received><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-core-oscore-groupcomm</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>M. Tiloca, F. Palombini</authors><title>Key Management for Group Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (Group OSCORE) Using Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments (ACE)</title><source>Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: IPV6 OPERATIONS"><entry id="draft-ietf-v6ops-claton"><draft>draft-ietf-v6ops-claton-16.txt</draft><date-received>2026-03-06</date-received><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>L. Colitti, J. Linkova, T. Jensen</authors><title>464XLAT Customer-side Translator (CLAT): Node Behavior and Recommendations</title><source>IPv6 Operations</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: OBLIVIOUS HTTP APPLICATION INTERMEDIATION"><entry id="draft-ietf-ohai-chunked-ohttp"><draft>draft-ietf-ohai-chunked-ohttp-08.txt</draft><date-received>2026-02-27</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-httpbis-incremental</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-irtf-cfrg-aead-limits</ref-name><ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state></normRef><authors>T. Pauly, M. Thomson</authors><title>Chunked Oblivious HTTP Messages</title><source>Oblivious HTTP Application Intermediation</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: CALENDARING EXTENSIONS"><entry id="draft-ietf-calext-ical-tasks"><draft>draft-ietf-calext-ical-tasks-17.txt</draft><date-received>2026-03-16</date-received><authors>A. Apthorp, M. Douglass</authors><title>Task Extensions to iCalendar</title><source>Calendaring Extensions</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-calext-jscontact-profiles"><draft>draft-ietf-calext-jscontact-profiles-14.txt</draft><date-received>2026-04-23</date-received><authors>R. Stepanek, M. Loffredo</authors><title>Protocol-Specific Profiles for JSContact</title><source>Calendaring Extensions</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: QUIC"><entry id="draft-ietf-quic-multipath"><draft>draft-ietf-quic-multipath-21.txt</draft><date-received>2026-03-18</date-received><authors>Y. Liu, Ed., Y. Ma, Q. De Coninck, Ed., O. Bonaventure, C. Huitema, M. Kühlewind, Ed.</authors><title>Managing multiple paths for a QUIC connection</title><source>QUIC</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT AREA WORKING GROUP"><entry id="draft-ietf-opsawg-ucl-acl"><draft>draft-ietf-opsawg-ucl-acl-15.txt</draft><date-received>2026-04-03</date-received><authors>Q. Ma, Ed., Q. Wu, M. Boucadair, Ed., D. King</authors><title>A YANG Data Model and RADIUS Extension for Policy-Based Network Access Control</title><source>Operations and Management Area Working Group</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype"><draft>draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype-18.txt</draft><date-received>2026-04-03</date-received><assignments><assignment>ref_checker</assignment></assignments><authors>G. Harris, Ed., M. Richardson</authors><title>Link-Layer Types for PCAP-related Capture File Formats</title><source>Operations and Management Area Working Group</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: GLOBAL ROUTING OPERATIONS"><entry id="draft-ietf-grow-nrtm-v4"><draft>draft-ietf-grow-nrtm-v4-11.txt</draft><date-received>2026-04-22</date-received><authors>S. Romijn, J. Snijders, E. Shryane, S. Konstantaras</authors><title>Near Real Time Mirroring (NRTM) version 4</title><source>Global Routing Operations</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: MBONE DEPLOYMENT"><entry id="draft-ietf-mboned-amt-yang"><draft>draft-ietf-mboned-amt-yang-09.txt</draft><date-received>2026-04-24</date-received><authors>Y. Liu, Ed., C. Lin, Ed., Z. Zhang, X. Geng, V. Kumar Nagaraj</authors><title>A YANG Data Model for Automatic Multicast Tunneling (AMT)</title><source>MBONE Deployment</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: TRANSPORT AND SERVICES WORKING GROUP"><entry id="draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-ecn"><draft>draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-ecn-08.txt</draft><date-received>2026-05-02</date-received><authors>M. Duke</authors><title>Configuring UDP Sockets for ECN for Common Platforms</title><source>Transport and Services Working Group</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: CODEC ENCODING FOR LOSSLESS ARCHIVING AND REALTIME TRANSMISSION"><entry id="draft-ietf-cellar-tags"><draft>draft-ietf-cellar-tags-25.txt</draft><date-received>2026-05-07</date-received><assignments><assignment>ref_checker</assignment></assignments><authors>S. Lhomme, M. Bunkus, D. Rice</authors><title>Matroska Media Container Tag Specifications</title><source>Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: INTERNET AREA WORKING GROUP"><entry id="draft-ietf-intarea-proxy-config"><draft>draft-ietf-intarea-proxy-config-14.txt</draft><date-received>2026-05-08</date-received><authors>T. Pauly, D. Damjanovic, Y. Rosomakho</authors><title>Communicating Proxy Configurations in Provisioning Domains</title><source>Internet Area Working Group</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: IP PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT"><entry id="draft-ietf-ippm-qoo"><draft>draft-ietf-ippm-qoo-11.txt</draft><date-received>2026-05-18</date-received><assignments><assignment>ref_checker</assignment></assignments><authors>B. I. T. Monclair, M. Olden, I. Kunze, Ed.</authors><title>Quality of Outcome (QoO)</title><source>IP Performance Measurement</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts"><draft>draft-ietf-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts-14.txt</draft><date-received>2026-03-17</date-received><authors>G. Mirsky, E. Ruffini, H. Nydell, R. Foote, W. Hawkins</authors><title>Performance Measurement with Asymmetrical Traffic Using Simple Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (STAMP)</title><source>IP Performance Measurement</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: COMPUTING-AWARE TRAFFIC STEERING"><entry id="draft-ietf-cats-framework"><draft>draft-ietf-cats-framework-24.txt</draft><date-received>2026-04-13</date-received><authors>C. Li, Ed., Z. Du, M. Boucadair, Ed., L. Contreras, J. Drake</authors><title>A Framework for Computing-Aware Traffic Steering (CATS)</title><source>Computing-Aware Traffic Steering</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-cats-usecases-requirements"><draft>draft-ietf-cats-usecases-requirements-14.txt</draft><date-received>2026-01-28</date-received><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-cats-framework</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>K. Yao, L. Contreras, H. Shi, S. Zhang, Q. An</authors><title>Computing-Aware Traffic Steering (CATS) Problem Statement, Use Cases, and Requirements</title><source>Computing-Aware Traffic Steering</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: ROUTING AREA WORKING GROUP"><entry id="draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc8347bis"><draft>draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc8347bis-22.txt</draft><date-received>2026-06-22</date-received><assignments><assignment>formatting</assignment></assignments><authors>Acee Lindem, Ed., Xufeng Liu, Athanasios Kyparlis, Ravi Parikh, Mingui Zhang</authors><title>A YANG Data Model for the Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP)</title><source>Routing Area Working Group</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: SOURCE ADDRESS VALIDATION IN INTRA-DOMAIN AND INTER-DOMAIN NETWORKS"><entry id="draft-ietf-savnet-intra-domain-problem-statement"><draft>draft-ietf-savnet-intra-domain-problem-statement-25.txt</draft><date-received>2026-06-01</date-received><authors>Lancheng Qin, Dan Li, Jianping Wu, Mingqing(Michael) Huang, Nan Geng</authors><title>Problem Statement, Gap Analysis, and Requirements for Intra-domain Source Address Validation</title><source>Source Address Validation in Intra-domain and Inter-domain Networks</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: MULTIPROTOCOL LABEL SWITCHING"><entry id="draft-ietf-mpls-mna-nrp-selector"><draft>draft-ietf-mpls-mna-nrp-selector-07.txt</draft><date-received>2026-06-22</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-teas-ns-ip-mpls</ref-name><ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state></normRef><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>Tony Li, Vishnu Beeram, John Drake, Tarek Saad, Israel Meilik</authors><title>MPLS Network Actions for Network Resource Partition Selector</title><source>Multiprotocol Label Switching</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: SIDR OPERATIONS"><entry id="draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-ta-tiebreaker"><draft>draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-ta-tiebreaker-06.txt</draft><date-received>2026-06-22</date-received><assignments><assignment>formatting</assignment></assignments><authors>Job Snijders, Theo Buehler, Ties de Kock</authors><title>Tiebreaking Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Trust Anchors</title><source>SIDR Operations</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-sidrops-avoid-rpki-state-in-bgp"><draft>draft-ietf-sidrops-avoid-rpki-state-in-bgp-11.txt</draft><date-received>2026-06-22</date-received><assignments><assignment>formatting</assignment></assignments><authors>Job Snijders, Tobias Fiebig, Massimiliano Stucchi</authors><title>Guidance to Avoid Carrying RPKI Validation States in BGP Path Attributes</title><source>SIDR Operations</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-ccr"><draft>draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-ccr-11.txt</draft><date-received>2026-07-07</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-profile</ref-name><ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state></normRef><authors>Job Snijders, Bart Bakker, Tim Bruijnzeels, Theo Buehler</authors><title>A Profile for Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Canonical Cache Representation (CCR)</title><source>SIDR Operations</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: SECURE TELEPHONE IDENTITY REVISITED"><entry id="draft-ietf-stir-certificates-ocsp"><draft>draft-ietf-stir-certificates-ocsp-14.txt</draft><date-received>2026-06-17</date-received><assignments><assignment>formatting</assignment></assignments><authors>Jon Peterson, Sean Turner</authors><title>OCSP Usage for Secure Telephone Identity Certificates</title><source>Secure Telephone Identity Revisited</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: SUPPLY CHAIN INTEGRITY, TRANSPARENCY, AND TRUST"><entry id="draft-ietf-scitt-scrapi"><draft>draft-ietf-scitt-scrapi-11.txt</draft><date-received>2026-06-29</date-received><assignments><assignment>formatting</assignment></assignments><normRef><ref-name>draft-ietf-scitt-architecture</ref-name><ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state></normRef><authors>Henk Birkholz, Jon Geater, Antoine Delignat-Lavaud</authors><title>Supply Chain Integrity, Transparency, and Trust (SCITT) Reference APIs</title><source>Supply Chain Integrity, Transparency, and Trust</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: TIME-VARIANT ROUTING"><entry id="draft-ietf-tvr-requirements"><draft>draft-ietf-tvr-requirements-11.txt</draft><date-received>2026-07-06</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><authors>Daniel King, Luis Contreras, Brian Sipos, Li Zhang</authors><title>Time-Variant Routing (TVR) Requirements</title><source>Time-Variant Routing</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-tvr-schedule-yang"><draft>draft-ietf-tvr-schedule-yang-12.txt</draft><date-received>2026-06-17</date-received><authors>Yingzhen Qu, Acee Lindem, Eric Kinzie, Don Fedyk, Marc Blanchet</authors><title>A YANG Data Model for Scheduled Attributes</title><source>Time-Variant Routing</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: IP SECURITY MAINTENANCE AND EXTENSIONS"><entry id="draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-mlkem"><draft>draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-mlkem-09.txt</draft><date-received>2026-07-07</date-received><assignments><assignment>formatting</assignment></assignments><authors>Panos Kampanakis</authors><title>Post-quantum Key Exchange with ML-KEM in the Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)</title><source>IP Security Maintenance and Extensions</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry><entry id="draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-downgrade-prevention"><draft>draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-downgrade-prevention-08.txt</draft><date-received>2026-07-07</date-received><assignments><assignment>formatting</assignment></assignments><authors>Valery Smyslov, Christopher Patton</authors><title>Downgrade Prevention for the Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)</title><source>IP Security Maintenance and Extensions</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IETF STREAM: IOT OPERATIONS"><entry id="draft-ietf-iotops-7228bis"><draft>draft-ietf-iotops-7228bis-10.txt</draft><date-received>2026-07-09</date-received><assignments><assignment>blocked</assignment></assignments><authors>Carsten Bormann, Mehmet Ersue, Ari Keränen, Carles Gomez</authors><title>Terminology for Constrained-Node Networks</title><source>IOT Operations</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="EDITORIAL STREAM: RFC SERIES WORKING GROUP"><entry id="draft-rswg-rfc7997bis"><draft>draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-11.txt</draft><date-received>2026-06-18</date-received><authors>Paul Hoffman</authors><title>Text in RFCs</title><source>RFC Series Working Group</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section><section name="IRTF STREAM: INTERNET CONGESTION CONTROL"><entry id="draft-irtf-iccrg-ledbat-plus-plus"><draft>draft-irtf-iccrg-ledbat-plus-plus-06.txt</draft><date-received>2026-06-23</date-received><assignments><assignment>formatting</assignment></assignments><authors>Praveen Balasubramanian, Osman Ertugay, Daniel Havey, Marcelo Bagnulo</authors><title>LEDBAT++: Congestion Control for Background Traffic</title><source>Internet Congestion Control</source><consensus>yes</consensus></entry></section></rfc-editor-queue>